The Good: The movie was actually pretty scientifically accurate, except for one scene where their ship was able to leave a planet that was 130% that of the gravity of earth with a ship that when leaving earth had to have significantly more boost. The visuals were also quite good, except for Anne Hathaway looking way too much like a mustache-less Hitler, and the idea of the movie was also pretty cool.
The Bad: I think the actors were a poor choice for the film. I can't watch Matthew McConaughey without thinking of him in all of his previous chick flick roles, John Lithgow is a comedy actor in my mind, Michael Caine is Alfred, and Anne Hathaway is just hit and miss with her roles. The amount of science used in the film made it hard for me to believe the science fiction when it got pretty far past theoretic. In my opinion, the relationships between characters was more spoken than portrayed. Overall, it felt like a very good try at something that could have been a lot better with a little more time. Speaking of time it was 3 hours long.
The Science
The science in this movie was actually very well done and believable. A real physicist was commissioned to assist in the accuracy of the films science which is likely why it was done as well as it was. At one point in the movie they go to a planet that is very close to a black hole, and because of the time dilation that occurs as a result of the gravity of the black hole 1 hour on that planet equates to 7 years outside of that gravitational field. As crazy as it sounds this is actually real science and it is called gravitational time dilation. Relativity is a very big driving force of the movie, because they need to find a habitable planet before earth essentially expires. Overall, I felt they did a very good job explaining a lot of the scientific concepts in the movie, but you had to pay very close attention or you would be left scratching your head if you aren't familiar with those concepts.The Cast
As said above I felt that the cast wasn't very strong just because of the type of actors that they got. I think had it been a better cast the relationships of the characters would have been more believable and stronger. A huge driving force of the movie is a father that wants to return home to his daughter, but the connection with them never seems that strong. In fact, that is just as much the direction as it was the actors. You are told from the beginning of the movie that Cooper (Matthew McConaughey) is more interested in the stars and science than he is anything else. The first scene in the movie is Cooper being told that he needs to go to parent teacher conference by his step father, because that isn't the role of a grandfather. So from the very beginning of the movie Cooper is seen as a distant father. Sorry, that doesn't have to do with the cast, but I just realized it. Anyway, I still believe a different cast could have made it better. I have seen McConaughey in way too many romantic comedies, John Lithgow only in comedies, and Anne Hathaway probably would have been fine if she kept a normal length hair and attempted to look like a woman. I wasn't going to bring this up, but another thing that bothered me about the cast was Matt Damon being the character Mann. I am pretty certain it wasn't necessary and kind of took attention away from his character's small role in the movie. The whole time I was just thinking why Matt Damon for this role? It was distracting. You don't find out about him 'til half way through the movie, but I just had to say something. It was completely pointless to cast him as that role. "And that's all I got to say about that." - Forest Gump
The Outstanding Bad
I am a person that is very specific about continuity in a film. I know that no film is going to be perfect, but there were things that really stood out and bothered me. The first thing is early in the film there is mention of 'ghosts' that you find out are trying to communicate with them, because Cooper's daughter Murph, named after Murphy's Law, determines that books pushed out of her book shelf are in a pattern that she determines is morse code. Later these 'ghosts' communicate the coordinates of some location using binary. Here is the problem I have with that. In the movie the binary is represented by 6-10 lines in the dirt. However an actually set of coordinates converted to binary would look something like:
001100110011000000101110001100100011100100110001001100100011100000001001001011010011100100110111001011100011011100110011001110000011010100111000001000000011001100110000001111110010000000110001001101110010011100100000001100100011100000100010
I know it is trivial, but people notice these things. Whenever there is a movie where a person playing an instrument doesn't match with the music they are playing it bothers me so it would make sense that something like this would do the same.
Another thing that bothered me was the robot TARS. Maybe I have been spoiled by movies like iRobot, Bicentennial Man, Terminator, Star Wars, and every other movie that has a robot. The problem is that I don't think I have. In this movie that robot looks like a fridge with 2 1980's computer monitors on it. I can't even describe the way he has to walk. So here is a gif to demonstrate:
Seriously? What the crap is that? Then somehow he can turn into a 4 french toast stick rolling thingy, and have hook hands. This 'robot' makes absolutely no sense, and all that it caused me to do was laugh at moments in the film that were not made to laugh at. I knew I couldn't take this movie seriously the second this thing showed up.
The final thing I will mention that made me not like the movie was the scene in the black hole. I feel like they needed a way to tie in everything in the movie, and so they just did something ridiculous. I am not a scientist, physicist, or any other type of ist, but I am almost certain that entering a black hole will kill you. What actually happens in the film is pretty far fetched and after all of the believable stuff in the movie kind of just seems like an easy way out and a way to throw the audience off in the process. It was kind of upsetting.
Conclusion
Should you see the movie? Yes.
Was it visually amazing? Yes.
Did it live up to all of the hype? Eh.
Was I disappointed? Yes.
I was really hoping to get my socks blown off by this movie. However, that did not happen and I left wishing it was better. So if you haven't seen it yet I recommend buying matinee tickets and carving out a 3 hour chunk of your day. That way you will have only lost 6 or 7 dollars and 3 hours of your life instead of $10 and 3 hours of your life. Then afterward get some comfort food with that money you saved so that you can handle your post movie depression better.